Free practice quiz
BCMTMS Prep Course (BCMTMS): free quiz
10 questions from the program. See your score right away, then unlock the explanation of every answer.
- Question 1 of 10
During a comprehensive medication review, a pharmacist notes that Elena M., a fictional patient, takes warfarin 5 mg by mouth once daily and started ibuprofen 800 mg by mouth three times daily for knee pain. Her INR was 2.6 last week, and she reports new bruising. Within pharmacist MTM scope, which action best translates the APhA/NACDS core elements into workflow?
Review Intervention/Referral and Follow-Up
A is correct: ibuprofen adds platelet inhibition and GI injury risk to warfarin anticoagulation, so MTM should include prescriber intervention, documentation, and INR/bleeding follow-up. C is tempting because PMR is core, but a list alone misses the urgent interaction. D is tempting as an OTC NSAID substitution, but naproxen retains bleeding risk. B is tempting as dose adjustment, but empiric warfarin reduction without protocol/prescriber risks thrombosis and leaves the NSAID hazard. Review Intervention/Referral — focus on interaction triage.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE NSAID plus warfarin; SAY recommend avoiding scheduled NSAID; MONITOR INR/bleeding within 3–7 days; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE melena, hematemesis, or extensive bruising. - Question 2 of 10
A patient’s PMR shows omeprazole 20 mg by mouth every morning and clopidogrel 75 mg by mouth daily after a recent coronary stent. The patient asks whether all medicines on the list can be continued together. As the MTM pharmacist, what is the best MAP focus?
Correct Answer: B
Omeprazole inhibits CYP2C19 and can reduce clopidogrel activation. In a PMR, this interaction should be assessed and documented on the MAP, with recommendation for a lower-interaction option if acid suppression is still indicated. The pharmacist should coordinate rather than independently change antiplatelet therapy.
NOTICE clopidogrel 75 mg daily with omeprazole 20 mg daily after stenting. SAY some acid reducers interfere more with clopidogrel activation than others. MONITOR for continued need for acid suppression and adherence to antiplatelet therapy. CLARIFY the best GI-protection strategy with the prescriber.
Why the other options are incorrect
A: Tempting because it compensates for reduced activation, but dose doubling is not the standard fix. C: Tempting because it remains in the same class, but esomeprazole shares a similar CYP2C19 concern. D: Tempting because stent protection is vital, but stopping clopidogrel is unsafe without prescriber direction.
NOTICE interaction management should preserve both antiplatelet and GI goals. SAY the preferred fix is usually to modify the interacting acid-suppressive strategy. MONITOR medication understanding at follow-up. HOLD autonomous antiplatelet discontinuation.
- Question 3 of 10A pharmacist in a medical home reviews amlodipine 10 mg by mouth daily and simvastatin 40 mg by mouth nightly for a patient seen every 3 months. The pharmacist consistently addresses indication, effectiveness, safety, and adherence for the entire regimen. Which service descriptor is best?
Correct Answer: A
Amlodipine can increase simvastatin exposure, and repeated assessment of indication, effectiveness, safety, and adherence across the whole regimen is exactly the CMM framework. Integration into a medical home and recurring follow-up strengthen the classification as CMM. Regular visits support proactive optimization rather than isolated intervention.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE whole-regimen review plus recurring follow-up; SAY how the team-based plan supports long-term medication optimization; MONITOR adverse effects and goal attainment at each scheduled visit; CLARIFY implementation authority for any direct medication changes.
Why the other options are incorrect
B: Tempting because MTM can occur in outpatient settings, but repeated whole-regimen accountability is more consistent with CMM. D: Tempting because cost may matter, yet simvastatin-amlodipine is a clinical safety issue, not merely a payer issue. C: Tempting because follow-up is ongoing, but longitudinal pharmacist care does not equal independent prescribing authority.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE when the service model exceeds a single review; SAY to the team which medication-related problems persist across visits; MONITOR completion of recommended changes after each encounter; HOLD unsupported assumptions about prescriptive autonomy.
- Question 4 of 10A pharmacist reconciles discharge medications for a beneficiary taking sacubitril/valsartan 49/51 mg by mouth twice daily, metoprolol succinate 50 mg by mouth daily, spironolactone 25 mg by mouth daily, and furosemide 40 mg by mouth daily. For Part D MTM eligibility, which medication count should generally be considered?
Why B is correct
CMS MTM targeting refers to multiple Part B medications, with plans defining thresholds within CMS parameters. In transitions of care, the pharmacist should reconcile all products, but MTM eligibility specifically centers on covered Part B medications in the plan design.
NOTICE: heart failure polypharmacy after discharge raises discrepancy risk. SAY: confirm each continued, changed, or stopped medication. MONITOR: weight, blood pressure, potassium, renal function, and refill timing per discharge plan. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: clarify duplicate RAAS therapy or worsening dyspnea urgently.
Why C is incorrect
It is tempting because simplified counts may seem operationally easy. The eliminating fact is that time-of-day dosing has no role in MTM eligibility criteria.
NOTICE: dosing schedule matters for adherence, not eligibility. SAY: create a clear medication schedule. MONITOR: missed doses and confusion at early follow-up. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: clarify if the patient cannot describe the regimen back correctly.
Why D is incorrect
It is tempting because OTC products are important for safety review. The single fact that eliminates it is that eligibility criteria focus on Part B medications, even though the pharmacist should assess all products clinically.
NOTICE: OTC NSAIDs can worsen heart failure and interact with RAAS therapy. SAY: ask specifically about nonprescription use. MONITOR: edema, blood pressure, and kidney function if NSAID use is suspected. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: escalate acute decompensation symptoms.
Why A is incorrect
It is tempting because class-based polypharmacy can signal risk. The eliminating fact is that MTM eligibility is not limited to one disease class count; it concerns the overall number of Part B medications defined by the plan.
NOTICE: class duplication may still be a medication-related problem. SAY: explain the purpose of each drug in the regimen. MONITOR: signs of therapeutic duplication after discharge. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: clarify suspected duplications with the prescriber promptly.
- Question 5 of 10A pharmacist reviewing metformin extended release 1000 mg by mouth twice daily is asked why a generic may still have a copay when the patient also purchased supplemental coverage. Which explanation is best?
Why C is correct
Even low-cost generics may carry copays depending on tiering and plan design. The pharmacist should normalize that possibility and help the patient identify the lowest-cost network option if affordability remains a concern.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE the patient expects zero cost for generics; SAY that many plans still apply cost sharing to generic medications; MONITOR refill adherence every 30 to 90 days; CLARIFY mail-order, preferred pharmacy, or 90-day supply pricing if needed.
Why A is incorrect
Tempting because generics are usually cheaper. The eliminating fact is that “cheaper” does not mean “always no copay.”
Why D is incorrect
Tempting because a low-cost generic copay may seem like a claims error. The eliminating fact is that generics can still occupy formulary tiers with defined cost sharing.
Why B is incorrect
Tempting because dose can influence utilization review. The eliminating fact is that the mere presence of a generic copay is not evidence that the dose is excessive.
- Question 6 of 10
Which aspect of medication therapy management (MTM) sessions is a potential DISADVANTAGE when they are conducted using the face to face model?
The best answer is A. It can be difficult for a patient to schedule the sessions due to SDOH. A face-to-face MTM model offers important advantages, but it can create access barriers related to social determinants of health (SDOH), such as transportation limitations, work schedules, caregiver availability, mobility issues, and geographic distance. These factors may make in-person visits harder to schedule and attend.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. Lack of prescription history is not a defining disadvantage of face-to-face MTM. In many in-person settings, the pharmacist may actually have better access to medication bottles, refill records, or direct patient-provided information.
C. Face-to-face MTM sessions are not inherently less effective than other models. In many cases, they may improve rapport, assessment, and education.
D. Lower reimbursement is not a universal or defining disadvantage of the face-to-face model. Reimbursement varies by payer, contract, and service structure.
Reference: Whalen K. Medication Therapy Management: A Comprehensive Approach, 2nd ed. McGraw Hill; 2018. MTM delivery models commonly identify transportation and scheduling barriers as disadvantages of in-person care.
- Question 7 of 10A community pharmacist reviews lisinopril 20 mg by mouth daily for a 64-year-old enrolled in Medicare Part D. Refill history shows multiple 30-day fills with intermittent 5- to 7-day delays because the patient forgets monthly pickup. Which MTM intervention is most likely to improve the Star adherence measure for renin-angiotensin system antagonists?
Correct Answer: B
ACE inhibitors and ARBs are included in a Star adherence measure. Repeated short refill delays often improve with medication synchronization and 90-day fills, which increase covered days without changing therapy. This is a pharmacist-centered, patient-safe adherence strategy consistent with MTM practice.
NOTICE: Recurrent small refill delays on lisinopril 20 mg daily. SAY: “Would a 90-day refill and aligned pickup date make this easier?” MONITOR: Refill timing over the next 2-3 fill cycles. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: Clarify cough, angioedema history, or symptomatic hypotension with the prescriber.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
C: Tempting because losartan is a related, plausible alternative. It is eliminated because the issue is adherence logistics, not ACE inhibitor intolerance, and independent switching is outside scope. A: Tempting because it stretches supply, but underdosing may reduce effectiveness and does not represent appropriate adherence improvement. D: Tempting because uncontrolled blood pressure matters, but delaying intervention misses a preventable adherence gap.
NOTICE: Logistics barrier rather than clear PK failure. SAY: “We can simplify how you get the medication.” MONITOR: PDC and patient-reported missed doses monthly. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: Escalate acute angioedema or severe hypotension urgently.
- Question 8 of 10A pharmacist performs medication reconciliation after hospital discharge for pneumonia. The patient’s home list included simvastatin 40 mg by mouth nightly. The discharge prescriptions include clarithromycin 500 mg by mouth twice daily for 7 days and simvastatin 40 mg nightly. What is the best pharmacist action?
Correct Answer: D
Clarithromycin is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and can substantially increase simvastatin concentrations, increasing the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. This is a high-yield reconciliation problem during discharge. The pharmacist should communicate with the prescriber to recommend a safer antibiotic or an appropriate statin management plan rather than allow the interaction to continue.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor added to a high-risk statin. SAY to the patient to report muscle pain, weakness, or dark urine. MONITOR for symptom onset during and shortly after antibiotic therapy. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE if rhabdomyolysis symptoms occur.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
C: Tempting because the course is brief, but even short exposure can produce clinically important statin accumulation. A: Tempting as chronic disease optimization, yet doubling simvastatin intensifies toxicity risk and has no role here. B: Tempting because lovastatin is a same-class substitute, but it is also significantly affected by clarithromycin and should not be switched independently.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE same-class interaction traps across CYP3A4-metabolized statins. SAY to the prescriber that an alternative not sharing this interaction may be preferred if continued lipid therapy is essential. MONITOR renal function if muscle injury is suspected. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE urgently for severe symptoms.
- Question 9 of 10During an MTM adherence and safety review, a pharmacist notes topiramate 100 mg by mouth twice daily for epilepsy on the active profile. A new order from another clinic adds acetazolamide 250 mg by mouth twice daily for altitude prophylaxis. Which discrepancy should be prioritized first?
Correct Answer: C
Topiramate and acetazolamide both inhibit carbonic anhydrase, increasing the risk of metabolic acidosis and nephrolithiasis when combined. This additive safety issue is the key discrepancy to prioritize. The pharmacist should review the necessity of combination therapy and recommend prescriber clarification and monitoring before routine use.
NOTICE: Topiramate 100 mg BID plus new acetazolamide 250 mg BID. SAY: "These medicines can have additive effects on body acid balance and stone risk, so I want to confirm the plan before you take both." MONITOR: Symptoms of acidosis, hydration status, renal concerns. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: Clarify promptly; escalate if marked lethargy or breathing changes occur.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
B: Tempting because environmental changes may raise seizure concerns. It is eliminated because increasing topiramate would worsen the additive adverse-effect risk. D: Tempting as a timing strategy. It is eliminated because acid-base effects are mechanism-based and not prevented by bedtime dosing. A: Tempting because antacids affect pH. It is eliminated because they do not resolve the systemic additive pharmacology.
NOTICE: Same-mechanism additive toxicity can outweigh indication-specific benefits. SAY: Explain the specific risk simply. MONITOR: Follow-up after regimen decision. HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE: Address combination risk before travel counseling details.
- Question 10 of 10A pharmacist reviews chronic kidney disease follow-up for a patient taking spironolactone 25 mg by mouth daily and losartan 100 mg by mouth daily. The chart shows no serum potassium or serum creatinine documented in 9 months. What is the most appropriate pharmacist recommendation?
Correct Answer: Close the potassium/renal monitoring gap
Losartan and spironolactone both reduce aldosterone-mediated potassium excretion, and their combination can precipitate hyperkalemia and worsening renal function, especially in CKD. Missing labs for 9 months is a significant safety monitoring gap that warrants prompt follow-up.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE RAAS-active combination in CKD without recent labs; SAY, "These medicines can raise potassium and affect kidney function, so lab monitoring is important"; MONITOR potassium and serum creatinine promptly and after dose changes; ESCALATE if weakness, palpitations, or severe renal decline is suspected.
Why the other options are incorrect
A: Tempting because the dose is within labeled ranges, but increasing before labs may worsen hyperkalemia. B: Tempting because ACE inhibitors and ARBs are both renoprotective individually, but combination RAAS blockade increases harm. D: Tempting because the regimen is familiar, but common doses do not remove the need for ongoing monitoring.
Review Safety Monitoring — focus on potassium and creatinine with RAAS-active therapy.
See why each answer is right or wrong
Enter your email to unlock the explanation of every question, free.






