Free practice quiz
CMCaP Prep Course (CMCaP): free quiz
10 questions from the program. See your score right away, then unlock the explanation of every answer.
- Question 1 of 10A patient taking cannabidiol oral solution 5 mg/kg/day by mouth divided twice daily asks how the endocannabinoid system differs from the cannabis product. As the pharmacist reviewing therapy and interaction risks, which explanation is most accurate?
Review ECS receptor-ligand-enzyme relationships
A is correct. Anandamide is primarily hydrolyzed by FAAH; 2-AG is primarily hydrolyzed by MAGL, and both can signal through CB1/CB2. C swaps enzymes and adds an unsafe hepatic-dose shortcut. D confuses phytocannabinoids with endocannabinoids; valproate increases liver-test concern with cannabidiol, not an automatic dose increase. B reverses carbamazepine’s role: it is an inducer that may lower cannabidiol exposure, not an inhibitor requiring dose reduction.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE enzyme swaps or interaction shortcuts; SAY endocannabinoids are not THC/CBD; MONITOR sedation and liver tests per product policy; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE for hepatic injury, severe sedation, or unverifiable orders. - Question 2 of 10
In a pharmacist-run medication review, a fictional adult uses cannabidiol oral solution 10 mg/kg/day PO divided BID for seizures, clobazam 10 mg PO BID, and warfarin 5 mg PO daily. They plan to add a dispensary product labeled THC 2.5 mg/CBD 25 mg PO nightly for sleep. Which pharmacist recommendation best applies THC/CBD pharmacology and interaction risk?
Review THC/CBD PK/PD
A is correct: THC is CB1-mediated and intoxicating; CBD has interaction relevance, including clobazam-related sedation and warfarin exposure concerns. C is tempting because CBD lacks THC-like intoxication, but FDA labeling warns of CYP-mediated clobazam interaction and hepatic monitoring. D is tempting for sleep, but THC impairment and limited evidence make replacement inappropriate without prescriber input. B is a dose-adjustment trap: higher CBD can increase exposure-related adverse effects and interactions. NOTICE clobazam/warfarin; SAY avoid unapproved add-on until clarified; MONITOR sedation, LFTs, and INR at baseline and follow-up; HOLD/CLARIFY for excessive sedation, LFT elevation, or INR instability.
- Question 3 of 10
As the medical cannabis pharmacist, you review a patient using full-spectrum hemp CBD oil 25 mg by mouth twice daily for neuropathic pain. The patient also takes warfarin 5 mg by mouth daily and asks whether the product is safe before an employer urine drug test. Which counseling recommendation is most appropriate?
Review Full-Spectrum Product Types
C is correct: full-spectrum products can contain trace THC, so drug-test risk and CBD-warfarin exposure/INR concerns require COA verification and prescriber communication. D is tempting because “hemp” suggests low THC, but it does not mean THC-free or clinically predictable. B is a dose-adjustment trap: loss of “entourage” claims does not justify doubling CBD; titrate cautiously. A is a testing trap: dronabinol is THC and may impair or trigger THC testing.
NOTICE warfarin plus cannabinoid use; SAY labels may not assure THC-free status; MONITOR INR within 3–7 days after changes and sedation each contact; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE for bleeding, marked INR rise, impairment, or employment-sensitive testing concerns. - Question 4 of 10
A 58-year-old patient uses THC 2.5 mg/CBD 2.5 mg oral capsules by mouth every evening for neuropathic pain. The patient asks the pharmacist about breakthrough symptoms at midafternoon and is also taking clarithromycin 500 mg by mouth twice daily for 7 days. The prescriber’s cannabis certification is active, but route changes require clinician approval. Which recommendation is most appropriate for the pharmacist to discuss?
Route-specific PK
C is correct: inhaled THC/CBD has rapid absorption and shorter duration, fitting breakthrough symptoms; the pharmacist should confirm authorization and policy. A is tempting because the same capsule is available, but oral THC has delayed onset and prolonged effects, so q30-minute redosing risks stacking. B is tempting as PRN oral therapy, but clarithromycin may inhibit CYP3A4 and raise THC exposure. D is tempting because oromucosal dosing seems faster, but repeated 5-minute THC dosing still risks accumulation.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE oral delay/CYP3A4 inhibition; SAY inhaled onset is faster but impairing; MONITOR sedation, dizziness, and relief daily during changes; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE if intoxication, unsafe driving, or authorization is unclear. - Question 5 of 10
As the medical cannabis pharmacist, you review cannabidiol oral solution 5 mg/kg by mouth twice daily for a fictional adult with seizure disorder. Current medications include clobazam 10 mg by mouth twice daily. The chart shows CYP2C19 poor-metabolizer status. Which recommendation best uses the pharmacogenomic result within pharmacist scope?
Review CYP And Variant Relevance
A is correct. Cannabidiol inhibits CYP2C19 and can raise N-desmethylclobazam; CYP2C19 poor-metabolizer status further supports anticipating sedation and clarifying dose/monitoring. C is tempting if clobazam is viewed as underactivated, but the active metabolite accumulates. D is a dose-adjustment trap: genotype alone is not a labeled cannabidiol dose-reduction rule. B ignores interaction risk and uses genotype as standalone guidance.
NOTICE clobazam plus CYP2C19 poor-metabolizer status; SAY sedation risk to prescriber and patient; MONITOR somnolence, falls, liver tests at baseline and follow-up; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE if severe CNS depression or unclear dosing plan. - Question 6 of 10
A medical cannabis clinic pharmacist reviews a patient taking warfarin 5 mg by mouth nightly with stable INR 2.4 and clobazam 10 mg by mouth twice daily. The patient asks to start cannabidiol (CBD) oil 25 mg by mouth twice daily for chronic neuropathic pain. Which pharmacist recommendation best manages the CYP-mediated interaction risk?
CBD with warfarin and clobazam
B is correct: CBD can inhibit CYP2C19 and affect CYP pathways relevant to clobazam and warfarin; exposure and monitoring feasibility drive significance. Early INR checks and sedation monitoring are safer than automatic dose changes. D is tempting because CBD is nonintoxicating, but it ignores narrow-therapeutic-index warfarin. C recognizes INR risk, but empiric 50% warfarin reduction may cause subtherapeutic anticoagulation. A is tempting as a route change, but THC products still have impairment and interaction concerns. NOTICE warfarin plus clobazam; SAY interaction risk requires prescriber coordination; MONITOR INR within days then weekly during titration and sedation each contact; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE before CBD if INR unstable, excessive sedation, or unclear authorization.
- Question 7 of 10
A pharmacist reviews Mina L., a 58-year-old with painful diabetic neuropathy taking pregabalin 150 mg PO twice daily, duloxetine 60 mg PO daily, and warfarin 5 mg PO daily. A clinician asks whether to add medical cannabis oil labeled THC 2.5 mg/CBD 2.5 mg per mL, PO nightly, for pain. Which pharmacist recommendation best reflects evidence appraisal and safety?
Review Neuropathic vs Nociceptive Pain Evidence
C is correct: cannabinoids may provide symptom relief in selected chronic neuropathic pain patients, but evidence does not show disease modification; warfarin and CNS effects require monitoring. A is tempting for analgesia, but high THC increases sedation and does not modify neuropathy. D is tempting because CBD is nonintoxicating, but CBD/THC may affect CYP pathways and INR. B is tempting as a broad pain claim, but pain mechanisms and study results differ by condition.
NOTICE warfarin plus CNS depressant burden; SAY benefit should be symptom/function based; MONITOR pain, function, adverse effects, and INR after initiation/titration; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE for excessive sedation, falls, bleeding, or unstable INR. - Question 8 of 10
A patient with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is prescribed cannabidiol oral solution 100 mg/mL at 2.5 mg/kg by mouth twice daily. Current antiseizure therapy includes clobazam 10 mg by mouth twice daily and valproate 500 mg by mouth twice daily. As the pharmacist reviewing the order before dispensing, which recommendation best supports safe, evidence-based use?
CBD in seizure disorders
A is correct: prescription cannabidiol has trial-supported dosing for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; CBD increases N-desmethylclobazam exposure and valproate increases transaminase risk, so counsel and monitor LFTs. B is tempting as titration logic, but rapid escalation and ignoring sedation/labs conflicts with labeling. D is tempting for access, but OTC CBD is not interchangeable with the approved product. C is tempting because valproate raises hepatic risk, but it is not an absolute contraindication.
Pharmacist Action: NOTICE clobazam/valproate; SAY report sedation or jaundice; MONITOR ALT/AST/bilirubin at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months; HOLD/CLARIFY/ESCALATE marked transaminase elevation or severe somnolence. - Question 9 of 10
As the pharmacist reviewing a medical cannabis follow-up, a 38-year-old with PTSD-related insomnia reports using THC/CBD oral solution 2.5 mg/2.5 mg by mouth nightly for 1 week. Current medications include sertraline 100 mg by mouth daily, prazosin 2 mg by mouth nightly, and clonazepam 0.5 mg by mouth at bedtime as needed. The patient says sleep improved for 3 nights and asks to increase to THC 10 mg nightly. Which pharmacist recommendation is most appropriate?
Evidence uncertainty and safety counseling
B is correct: oral THC/CBD has variable psychiatric evidence; short sleep improvement does not prove long-term PTSD benefit, and THC plus clonazepam can increase CNS depression. C is tempting as titration, but THC 10 mg is a dose-escalation trap with greater impairment risk. D is tempting for onset, but inhalation does not reduce CNS interaction risk. A is tempting after response, but stopping sertraline is outside pharmacist scope and not evidence-based. NOTICE sedative co-use; SAY benefits are uncertain; MONITOR cognition/dizziness weekly during changes; HOLD/CLARIFY escalation if impairment, falls, or benzodiazepine use occurs.
- Question 10 of 10
A pharmacist reviews evidence for a patient taking warfarin 5 mg orally nightly who asks about a 4-week randomized trial of THC 2.5 mg/CBD 2.5 mg oromucosal spray, 1 spray every 6 hours as needed for neuropathic pain. The trial used an active placebo causing dry mouth but no euphoria; pain was self-reported, sample size was 36, and INR was checked weekly. Which appraisal best identifies the main internal-validity threat?
Trial blinding appraisal
C is correct: THC/CBD can cause psychoactive effects, so participants may infer allocation; subjective pain scores become expectancy-sensitive. D is tempting because active placebo and INR monitoring address adverse effects/interactions, but dry mouth matching does not mask euphoria. B is tempting because short duration limits safety durability, but it does not alone invalidate short-term efficacy. A is tempting because CBD has CYP and liver-monitoring issues; changing comparator answers a different question.
NOTICE psychoactive unblinding; SAY confidence is limited; MONITOR pain/function at follow-up; HOLD/CLARIFY if allocation concealment or adverse-event reporting is unclear.
See why each answer is right or wrong
Enter your email to unlock the explanation of every question, free.






